BEGUM AKHTAR MIRZA versus ZAHIDA PARVEEN
Article 199 petitioner of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 filed a petition before the High Court stating that some women, along with some miscreants, had stolen her golden jewelry, household goods, etc. and when she (the applicant) Attempts to file a criminal case against him, police demanded bribe from his applicant, also stated that it was not possible for a lawyer to pay the fee for the purpose of filing a constitutional petition. That the Free Legal Aid Committee be instructed to provide it with the help of a lawyer. The court directed the petitioner to file an affidavit in support of her statement, calling the petitioner's constitutional jurisdiction as a constitutional jurisdiction. The PPC was registered and the probe is underway. The petitioner had disclosed that another crime had been committed. The High Court directed the police to record the applicant's supplementary statement and then proceed further as per law. Except, the applicant's bald oath, when there is no evidence to support the applicant's allegation of seeking bribe by the police. , The High Court further observed that if the applicant was serious in pursuing the matter, she could approach the Anti-Corruption Authorities or the top police officers of the department.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer