Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 // 34 Testimonies of evidence were relevant and interesting to the eyewitness and were not found to have occurred, but the recovery of the knife was of no importance as serologist for blood transfusion studies. Was never sent and was proof of its reasoning. Not to believe that ocular evidence could not be proved with the help of independent evidence. Probably the available evidence was withheld by the prosecution, so the charge failed to prove that there was any doubt. immigration advocate from Thul lawyer