The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Contempt Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974, 3/24 appeal, contradicts the ocular evidence of evidentiary medical evidence and the report of the Ballistic Expert is against the prosecution version, witnesses were not only witnesses of the occasion and their Was also related to the deceased. They had strained relations with the accused and the Shariat court had properly denied all the officers of the Investigation until the DIG had dismissed the accused's innocent appeal in bad condition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
