The definition of the record of sections 13 (e) and 9 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 did not indicate whether at any stage during the trial, the accused was asked whether he had a license for the alleged robbery. In these circumstances, the accused is prevented from giving? His explanation and thus he did not violate the provisions of Section 9 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, the punishment of the accused was not found guilty under Section 13 (e) of the Arms Ordinance, 1965 and accordingly he was acquitted. Was done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
