Find a Lawyer

AMIR ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI versus FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION

Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 32 West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 ([MLR 64]) Regulation No. 64 has effect on the reference given by the Chief Land Commissioner in exercising his own amending powers, They were canceled. The applicant's determination to review the determination of holding that was ultimately disposed of by the competent authority's order challenged the order that following the cancellation of MLR No. 64 under paragraph 32 of MLR 115 , The Chief Land Commissioner had no jurisdiction. Sub-paragraph (3) of paragraph 32 of MLR No. 115, in exercise of its own discretion, to make reference to the Additional Chief Land Commissioner for review of respondents' determination to withhold the applicant's position. Was saved. Which provided that the cancellation of the MLR number ofeal shall not affect any proceedings pending before the formation of the authority or under the prescribed rig, the application of the MLR number of 64 at the time of cancellation In the case of the petitioner, which proceedings were not in progress, and the matter regarding the applicant's determination to hold the matter had not been reached or inquired nor could the review be made during the MLR currency. Was. No 64 plates were picked up by the respondent authority, which was approved by the Additional Chief Land Commissioner on reference, protected under sub-paragraph (3) (c) of paragraph 32 of MLR No. 115. immigration advocates contact from Taxila lawyer