IJAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 2302 / Pro 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 appealed against the acquitted defendants in particular and was undoubtedly a bullet that struck the victim's elbow. The indictment of the accused was proved, however, but could not be proved. The burden was on sharing a common intention with the co-accused who shot the deceased, and he was solely responsible to the extent that he personally delivered it, resulting in the offender being convicted in the section 307, pp. He was convicted under C and had already been sentenced. He was fined because he had been in custody for about three years
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Khoski lawyer