Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IJAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE


Section 2302 / Pro 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 appealed against the acquitted defendants in particular and was undoubtedly a bullet that struck the victim's elbow. The indictment of the accused was proved, however, but could not be proved. The burden was on sharing a common intention with the co-accused who shot the deceased, and he was solely responsible to the extent that he personally delivered it, resulting in the offender being convicted in the section 307, pp. He was convicted under C and had already been sentenced. He was fined because he had been in custody for about three years

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.