Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD BHATTI versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE

The government employees of the Food Department were given the responsibility of storing wheat, which benefited from the sun and rain, while the government employees were punished as well as the government employees. Recovery from their loss gave them the maximum relief to the extent of their financial powers, yet it was acknowledged that each of the public servants deserved more than what was denied. Because the authorized authority did not have the financial power to write more than that amount. The authority could transfer the authority, who had unlimited powers, to write money which was more than the amount it wrote, but such authority did not adopt the loss of wheat due to public servants. There was no cause for negligence of duties and improper performance. Government employees were not liable for such damage or damage to purchased wheat which could result in poor storage facilities. when you need a advocate from Chak 46 lawyer