MUHAMMAD SALIM ALIAS AKHTAR versus THE STATE
Clauses 11, 10 (3), 16 and 10 (2) Appreciate the evidence F-seven-day delay F: IR is not material where the honor of the family involves the lure of the prosecutor by the accused, he has been there for several years Lives in His recovery from months and the custody and possession of the accused, with his free will and choice, was proven on record, the age of the prosecutor at the trial did not result in 16 years of age because he committed puberty. Was proved on the record. Under Sections 11 and 10 (3) of the Ordinance, the accused were changed under the circumstances under sections 16 and 10 (2) of the Ordinance, respectively and sentenced thereunder.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Noorpur nooranga lawyer
