The plaintiff, who appealed to the High Court of Section 3 of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972, who claimed that he was the owner of the fishing boat, claimed that he had seized the same and permanently prohibited boat. He had taken possession of the state authorities of Maswak and then the defendant / defendant was auctioned and bought such a boat and claimed possession of it which was given to him on security. The interest of the plaintiff plaintiff was fully cared for by the trial court as the defendant / interlocutor was instructed to offer a bank guarantee of a certain amount, which is sufficient to protect the plaintiff's interest. The intervention was sought under a trial court order under which he handed over the boat to the defendant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
