Find a Lawyer

WIN PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR

Section 196 Expression such The questions arising from the scope of such order / scope of the reference imposed by the importer were not borne out by the Appellate Tribunal's decision, nor was the expression of litigation at any stage - Such an order is born in section 196 of the Customs Act 1969, with the decision of the appellate tribunal that the question of law arose, no question of law was raised by the appellate tribunal's order, and neither Neither the law was appealed nor any forum refusing to interfere with its reference jurisdiction. Was done. Order Approved by Appellate Tribunal Reference Rejected in Conditions \ r \ n

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2014

• SHIFA INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL LTD. v. NADEEM AKHTAR 2014 MLD 1515
• FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE v. Kh. SAAD SALEEM 2014 PTD 1531
• SAMAR ABBAS v. SIKANDAR 2014 YLR 1618
• AEROTRON (PRIVATE) LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister (Chief Executive) 2014 CLC 1630
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ alias DOCTOR v. State 2014 YLR 1924
• ASAD HAFEEZ v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2014 PTD 2003
• COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, ISLAMABAD v. MUBARAK SHAH 2014 PTD 2007
• COMMUNICATION HOUSE (PVT) LTD. v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY 2014 PLD 1

All Islamabad judgments of 2014 →

advocate for immigration from Cherat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes