I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989. versus — jobs for fresh lawyers in Kurram

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help

Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

Chat on WhatsApp — Free Or unlock 10 direct numbers for Rs 1,000

I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989. versus I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989.

Section 134 (3) and (4) of the Appellate Tribunal, the Convention Appellant has neither explained any reason nor filed a petition for contempt of delay in the timely application of the appeal when the appeal was punctual. Was deleted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

jobs for fresh advocates from Kurram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989. versus I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989.

Find a Lawyer Near You