I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989. versus — lawyer for immigration in Shikarpur

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access

Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment

⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000

Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989. versus I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989.

Section 134 (3) and (4) of the Appellate Tribunal, the Convention Appellant has neither explained any reason nor filed a petition for contempt of delay in the timely application of the appeal when the appeal was punctual. Was deleted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

advocate for immigration from Shikarpur lawyer

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989. versus I.TA. NO.2382/LB OF 1984-85, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1989.

Find a Lawyer Near You