Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WAJID UMAR ALIAS GOGI versus THE STATE


Section 17 (4) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34, 324/34 and 336/34 [Repealed by the Criminal Law (Fourth Amendment) Ordinance (XXX of 1991)] by the trial court The prosecution's witnesses were not examined. Testimony began to meet the requirements of Al-Shudh, but at the end of his related cross-examination he asked him some questions to fulfill the required requirements in this regard, but he failed to provide the opportunity, the accused. In order to investigate, the witnesses said that the trial court's failure to allow the accused to do so was a violation of whatever was in the record to support the charge against him. He has been brought in to give him an opportunity to challenge and thus fight against it. Established the principles of criminal justice management and dealt with it with great prejudice, resulting in the conviction and sentencing of the accused and was remanded to the trial court for the latest hearing. Accused by law:

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Hafizabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.