Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

Civil Procedure Code Order III, R1 and 4 of the CPC Accredited Agents and Applicants and Section 115 Lawyer's Statement, Its Impact, was filed by the five plaintiffs against the applicant of the Municipal Committee on the client suit. Due to which the plaintiff's case against the municipal committee was also present. The decision was made, the committee went to appeal and the applicant was involved in the appeal as the respondents were decided on the basis of statements against all the six respondents / defendants which was claimed by the counsel of the parties' parties which was earlier. The case was enforced as a plaintiff and a defendant. The lawyer did not engage with the confession on whose statement the appeal was accepted, the applicant did not make any statement himself, the lawyer's statement which was never linked to the applicant, the lawyer said The Appellant could not, by the Court of Appeal, be bound by the judgment and order. By Applicant; The High Court will not impose sanctions against the applicant by rejecting the decision and order passed by the Court of Appeal and in accordance with the law, the judgment will be remanded in advance. top advocate from Sihala lawyer