Find a Lawyer

AMEER NAWAZ KHAN versus HAQ NAWAZ

Section 163 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, after fourteen years, the mutation review was shown for residential purposes in the mutation for review purposes, and the respondents in this motion also reviewed the change on this basis. That the applicant was using for agricultural purposes. Competing for the last fourteen years of Resident One where the sale-based changes were approved, the Revenue Authorities were unable to ask whether the agreement between the parties had been enforced, in order to enforce the agreement between the respondent parties. Could resort to a civil court that was not reviewable. Conditions lawer from fb area from Lala rukh lawyer