NAZIR AHMAD versus ABDUL RAHIM
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary Injections and Interlocutory Orders OXXXIX, RR l, 2, 4 & Section 115G Ant Provisional Order Removal Trial was granted by the court to the plaintiff / applicant according to which the defendants / Defendants were barred from raising the buildings, after which the appellate court defendant challenged the property, arguing that the appellate court's order had been revised that the buildings on the property in dispute were defendants. / The defendants had earlier issued the trial after the trial proceedings. Investigation of the applicants / plaintiffs on the legality of their review at the review stage requires that the High Court cannot comment on it in its reviewing jurisdiction in case of trial. It was agreed that it would not separate the property until its final decision. Further construction on the property at the Disposable will be a risk and cost risk to the respondents and will neither affect the rights of the plaintiff / applicant nor will they work in relation to the appropriate relief under which the plaintiff is sued. Will be entitled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer