WASEEM HUSSAIN SHAH versus REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD
Section 4 Promotion Appellant and Defendant were appointed because the patwarius appellant challenged the seniority of the defendant and his circular record shows that the collector's position as the plaintiff was promoted, by Nazir and his. He was subsequently transferred to the Office of Qinong Appellant for misunderstanding. This mistake was unilaterally pushed aside by corrigendum while assessing Gardaur's inter-sectoralism, in fact he was promoted as a gardaur before appellant, and so on. I could not be junior had never been challenged by the development of the respondents. The appellant cannot, therefore, be allowed to take advantage of any entry that is inadvertently listed in the seniority order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
