MUHAMMAD SALIM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Section 13 Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Section 30 The relationship between the landlord and the tenant on behalf of the landlord has appealed to the applicants (tenants). Contest was a tenancy agreement. The legal tenants of such respondents under Section 30, Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 (after cancellation), who were allotted the property in question and who paid the transfer cost. Who were (after cancellation) and responsible for paying rent. This; the implementation of the tenancy agreement reinforced their obligation; settlement authorities, meanwhile, had auctioned the property in favor of the respondents / auction buyers, but such auction was held by the High Court. And the decision of the High Court was affirmed by the petitioners of the Supreme Court. Attachment to the auction buyers' respondents and continue to pay their rent even after the auction has been separated by the High Court, which did not justify the act by the applicants - the landlord and tenant relationship proved to be in the relationship.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Patoki lawyer