Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AHMED versus STATE

Section 484 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 228, the defendants regretted the loss without apology and apologized to the presiding judge for their foolishness, and not only before the declaration of conviction and sentencing decision. The accused admitted that was in fact true and did not unnecessarily try to create any confusion either through preliminary proceedings or by contesting the election held indefinitely, if the matter was not justified. It will be difficult to find any other case besides the above mentioned case. Exemption can be granted to the accused on the basis of which the accused has immediately said and done before the trial court. That is, the guilty plea and there was no limit to the technical ability of the apex, the Supreme Court accepted the pardon of the accused and, at the discretion of the court, he was acquitted and sentenced. law firms from Sambrial lawyer