HABIB ULLAH KHAN versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SARGODHA
R6 2 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Departmental employee against Assistant Sub Inspector Police, was lodged two months' registration of theft case against the department and the department proceedings. It was censored at the end. Instead of conducting regular inquiries against a public servant, a summary procedure was adopted where the dispute could be resolved only by presenting witnesses and recording their evidence, so that the aggrieved government employee should be prosecuted through regular inquiry so that The parties involved can cope with this. In this case, the aggrieved public servant has the opportunity to examine the prosecution's testimony and to present testimony in his defense, even though he may cast a cast iron lawsuit against a public servant on a credible and non-transferable basis. Not worth it Evidence records show that civil servant may not recover D liability
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
