THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Pakistan Penal Code Section 448 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), against the breach of section 417 evidence, allegedly lodged a complaint with the Court of Appeal, following a warrant to evict the lower part of the house. Done. The trial court was occupied by a complaining judge who was not misled to acquit the accused, nor does it violate accepted principles of appreciation of evidence which were neither artificial nor shocking and The ridiculous interference could not be made, even if it was possible to draw a different reasonable conclusion. On the basis of the evidence on record, there have been no cases of interference in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer
