NISAR AHMAD KIYANI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT' OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
R 6 (5) Mandatory Removal of Employees Mandatory Inquiry Against Government Employees The principle is that the inquiring officer must occupy a position or grade in which the accused officer was acting more strictly because the inquiry officer was the superintendent. Was an engineer and was working as an electrical inspector. When a civil servant was an executive engineer, a public servant, therefore, the status quo could not be considered equal to the inquiry officer's inquiry was made against a civil servant who was committed by someone who was capable of doing such work. The law was in accordance with R 2. )) Inquiries against a competent officer of a public servant shall be prohibited from acting as such officer only then he shall be refused to act as an authorized officer only as a result of his personal action. If I am interested, the authorized officer is not prohibited from doing so, simply because there was a member of the Vigilance Commission who reported the accused's case to Government R7.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
