SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH versus TASNEEM HUSSAIN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Termination of Services Due to Absence of Section O15 (4) Duty, The valid charges mentioned in the showcase notice were vague and in details. Was lacking. Regarding the dates on which the worker was absent from the duty and there was nothing to disclose, the alleged misconduct had to be taken within one month, in accordance with the requirements of Section O (15) 4 of Ordinance VI of the employer's witness in 1968. Inside was brought to the notice of the employee. There was no inquiry before termination of service so order to terminate service was not valid
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Sherani lawyer
