BARKAT ALI versus THE STATE
Except for the complainant, there was no other evidence linking the accused to the crime, which did not name any of the accused in the FIR, it said. One of the suspects was identified by him. On the occasion, while the other could not be identified by him, he submitted to the court that he could not identify any of the accused because their faces were lubricated. Other contradictions were also found in the complainant's statement. When the accused were arrested, they were in police uniform, while their brother, as a witness, stated that they were in plain clothes. Such contradictions that went to the root of the case cannot be ignored. It is alleged that she was taking defense from the very beginning on which they acted. In such a situation, it cannot be doubted that the trial court should have good ides in the work of defense. It was alleged that he had accused the police of enmity and presented a documentary. In such a case, the evidence failed to present the case against the accused, and the convicts were acquitted and they were acquitted of the charge.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Garh More lawyer