NAZIR AHMAD MUKHIALVI versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT
Section 4 Appeal Limit The Appellant Was Retired From The Job After An Inquiry Appellant filed a review application with the Authority and after approximately nine years, the Appellant's Appellant was appointed after filing an appeal to the Service Tribunal. An appeal was not filed before the service tribunal within the period as provided under Section 4, Azad Jammu. And the idea of finding out the result of the Kashmir Service Tribunals Act, 1975 or his review petition for nine years, when he applied for the preliminary decision of his review petition, the appellant had kept himself inactive for quite a while. The rejection order of the applicant was requested by the competent authority in 1979, after which he kept the mother for about nine to nine years to know the destiny of his services and the manner in which the appellant's slow behavior and It could be excluded from the practice that he had deliberately hidden the factual facts on file and filed his review patent. Ion to learn developed a tool to develop application nine years later
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
