ULFAT ALI versus ABDUL SLIAKOOR
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 5, 10 and 15 (2) (ii) of the payment of the rent determined by the landlord that the tenancy was organized by an agreement found between the parties. Was denied by the tenant, who raised serious questions about the authenticity of the contract. As required by Section 5 of the Ordinance, the record was not verified by the rent controller or by any civil judge or first class magistrate, since the terms of such agreement could not be enforced, so rent between the parties. The tenancy will be executed under an oral agreement, the disputed month's rent is submitted by the tenant for a period of sixty days, there was no default by the tenant in paying the rent.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Nowshera Cantt lawyer
