Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus THE STATE

The accused, Pakistan Penal Code Sections 468 and 471/34, pleaded that it was the prosecution which had obstructed the revenue generation and also submitted a fake copy of the jamabandi on the basis of which they were accused of supporting their arguments. He was prosecuted, and he mentioned them. The copy of the alteration, also showed a copy of the jumble, in which the accused was clearly mentioned as one of the owners of the disputed land with the complainant / prosecutor but whom he was allegedly involved in. The source was forcibly expelled, the recorded records show that it was fully established that due to lack of proper attention by the defense lawyer, such documents could not be brought on record and trial. The court was misled by some fraudulent entries which were brought to the record by the prosecution and the accused were kept separate And he became worse famous supreme court advocate from Digri lawyer