Find a Lawyer

M.S. ENGINEERING CO. versus MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ

The order by the tenant controller to remove the ex parte parties against the tenants was challenged by the holders of the Sindh Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15, 19 and 21 of the Ex parte Order Order that the landlords had The manipulation of the service through fake means has never happened. The rent controller has been served, who acknowledged that it did not rush to advance the former PAN against the tenants, but had exhausted all available methods to affect their service, and not only that. Once, but again, tenants were shown the greatest greed in terms of their service. Their service was personally affected by the publication twice, under the Registered Corps twice and at least once under the Postal Certificate and twice by attaching it to the tenants to doubt the authenticity of the service and There was no justification for the tenant's claim that the landlords could have acted fraudulently with them. Do not uphold the tenants' appeal against the tenant's previous eviction order, as can be dismissed on the basis of qualifications on the basis that it was admittedly timely barred. famous lower court advocate from Tank lawyer