Find a Lawyer

SAJID HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD LATIF

10 and 12 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), both the respondents and the appellants qualifying for the development of section 42 were to be considered for development by the Chief Executive of the Selection Board. Defendants' views were not considered. Name of the Respondents As the Respondent's most senior civil servant, the Promotion Service was entitled to the Tribunal's decision that the appointment by appellant's appointment was invalid, which the Supreme Court maintained. inheritance advocates near Depal Pur lawyer