MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUNCIPAL CORPN.
The ruling to amend the 0XXX, RR1, 2 and Section 115 is arbitrary treatment, the two courts below have for the past several years refused to use arbitrary in favor of the applicants (tenants). The applicants were using property such as tenants on a commercial basis. However, the Respondent's / Landlord's approved plan was approved solely because the Master Plan violation could not be used for commercial purposes, as a property of the applicant. Want different behaviors. The applicants were therefore not entitled to arbitrary relief in their favor
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Poonch lawyer
