Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 304 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Imprisonment, the amount of accused proved guilty and sentenced to imprisonment till the height of the court and Rs 1500 to the Additional Sessions Judge for use in the revised jurisdiction. The sentence was extended by one year. No evidence of any legal weakness can be identified in the statements of witnesses found satisfactory on the RI evidence record of the year. Additional Sessions Judge did not violate any provision of the law. The RI was neither strict nor excessive, and the writ petition was considered as a writ petition in the High Court and there was no justification for interference with the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.