THE STATE versus RAFIULLAH ALIAS GUL
Prohibited (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Articles 3/4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 417 and 249 Section 103, were not appealed against the finding of acquittal in accordance with the provisions of CR PC and if so So too In this case, despite 51 delays, both witnesses were not presented to the eligible area, but the case was not likely to be successful because of the hereditary lacunae, the housekeeper searched, pursuant to Section 249A. The case was registered under trial, which resulted in the CCP being retained and the appeal against the bad army dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Jhal Magsi lawyer
