GUL RAZA versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee, no one was hurt in the alleged cancellation of the accused but he allegedly fired at the party. Which is an ineffective question about Satan. In the specific circumstances of the case, the liability of the accused, further investigation is needed, despite the fact that the trial court extended the bail exception against the accused despite direct charges against the accused in the FIR trial court. Based on the material placed against, the FIR and the statements. Recorded under section 161, the CCP shall be fully justified in questioning whether a case of constructive liability was brought against the accused and in which case the accused is certainly liable for such liability. In the absence of any justification for any interference in the trial. While granting bail to the accused, their request to cancel the bail was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mandra lawyer
