Arts 188 and 185 (3) The Supreme Court's petition for leave to appeal against the interim order of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R1 High Court, was filed in Rawalpindi instead of Lahore, where the applicant , His lawyer and the lawyer on record, the Supreme Court directed that his client have to bear the additional costs of filing an application in Rawalpindi. They (the solicitors) should record the applicants with a certificate. The applicant was compensated for unnecessary expenditure on filing his application in Rawalpindi, which failed, in which the registrar of the court started proceedings against the lawyer of the professional misconduct lawyer in this case. It was directed, however, that a certificate was filed, stating that a petition was being filed in Rawalpindi on Petty's insistence and specific request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
