EJAZ AHMED, versus CHAIRMAN, MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MIRPUR
Section 44 The termination of applicant's services was subject to the approval of respondents of the valid applicant's appointment order. The respondent authority did not approve the applicant's appointment. Similarly, the first aspect was wrong where the cause of action was ordered. Illegal or invalid, the jurisdiction cannot temporarily appeal to the High Court for the appointment of the applicant, it was not granted the right to seek immunity from the High Court under the constitutional jurisdiction. With the terms and conditions of service, the High Court was unavailable in the constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
