MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus STATE
The surrender of the Illegal Arms Ordinance 1991 Section 7 (1) (b) definition of evidence did not adversely affect the prosecution's case as a witness investigating officer because an inspector and a sub-inspector who included Prepared Recovery Memo was signed. Both witnesses were examined, but they were not offered any enmity or illicit desire, nor were they advised that there was any implication. The phenomenon of cross-examination suggested that the acquittal of the license without a license, that the testimony of the prosecution had been accepted, as credible and that the victim of the trust could safely rely on the conviction and in the circumstances. , The punishment of the accused is maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer
