Find a Lawyer

ULBRICHT\'S WWE. GES M.B.H. versus ULRICHT\'S (PAK)

S9309 accused of excluding relevant applicant from participating in company affairs. Nothing was brought on record to prove such an allegation, which shows that a 49% stakeholder in the company was reluctant to handle the affairs of the company and that the company had no meetings other than a few meetings. I failed to attend but no request was ever made by the applicant to seek the applicant's meeting. The applicant's board of directors had at one stage decided to withdraw from the company without any notice. The applicant's only interest was that the petitioner suffered a failure on a reasonable and equitable basis to circumvent the company. famous supreme court advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes