Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MOBILE EYE SERVICE versus DIRETCOR, S.W.


Subject to the application of section 12 (2) to Section 12 (2) and 0XXIII, R 3, the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, in the application of section 12 (2), it was alleged that the solicitor was on behalf of his client. There was no option to compromise. But there was not even a remote suggestion that his consent was affected by the consideration of any fraud, or that his consent with the opposing party in any way to compromise. It has been shown that there was no allegation of wrongdoing by the lawyer. When the authority to compromise on behalf of his client was not made at the time of settlement, no objection could then be raised in the presence of the parties and the lawyer. The provision of section 12 (2), Civil Code of Conduct, 1908, was not drawn to the facts of the case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Mohmand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.