There is no reference in the Speedy Trials Ordinance (XXV of 1991), Sections 5 (2) and 5 (1) to the Special Courts Sections 302/34 and 324/34, which the High Court considered in the public interest Should be the pending case. The order did not include details of the pending case and the court where he is pending, though there was a reference to the special court with the location and name of the presiding officer where he was to be transferred. It was found that a similar case was seen both with and without jurisdiction where the Section 5 (1) Special Court had jurisdiction to hear the case immediately. Such a defect was submitted which was supposed to have jurisdiction, under which, it could be ignored and a proper amendment or clarification may be sought before proceedings in the case. Was unable to deliver jurisdiction that was already defective and was related to the transfer of a case that was merely listed, Pbuh pending court decision was left with the direction that the session be trial by the court, where he was the last pending case. Unless a new order is approved by the government in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
