Find a Lawyer

MANAGER, FOREST OPERATION (MALAKAND CIRCLE) versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN

VIII, R10 For the purpose of attacking the defense for failure to violate written statements despite the earlier two motions, VIII, R10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 O VIII, R 10, Civil The Naughty Extension Code of Conduct, 1908, which allows defendants to prevent a defense from failing to file a written statement, will apply in the same case when written by O VIII, R 1, CPC. Whether to enter a written statement or consider a further written statement. O VIII, R 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 1992

• MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. THE STATE 1992 PLD 156
• MUHAMMAD AFSAR v. KHIAL MAST 1992 PLD 158
• SADAQAT ALI ALIAS PITTI v. THE STATE 1992 PLD 161
• SAIF NADEEM KAWASAKI MOTORS LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. 1992 PLD 166
• NAZAR ALI v. THE STATE 1992 PLD 176
• GHIASUDDIN v. THE STATE 1992 PLD 179
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. THE STATE 1992 PLD 187
• GADOON TEXTILE MILLS LTD v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR 1992 PLD 191

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 1992 →

best law firm from Tando Adam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes