SYED AZAM RAZA versus SINDH AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY
Section 28 (vi) Sindh University Law (Amendment) Ordinance (III of 1982), Section 4 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petitionability Civil Service Upgrade Petitioner Appointed as a LAN Technician on Bachelor Degree in Computer Science Was. Through the contract-based selection board and subsequently in the BNS 16, the status of LAN technician as well as the allowance allowable under the rules against the vacant post of LAN Technician (BPS 17) Was formalized, on which the applicant had already received the applicant after receiving it. The master's degree sought his upgrade at BPS 17 (the authority) was that the defendant / university's terms and conditions of service were not governed by legal rules, so the constitutional petition could not be retained and the LAN technician could not be retained. There was no vacant post (BPS 17) available with the University which regulated the volatility petitioner's services by the Vice-Chancellor. The University had the powers granted under Section 28 (vi) of the Sindh Agricultural University Act, 1977. The use of the applicant is read with Section 4 (b) of the Sindh University Law (Amendment) Ordinance 1982; The order to regulate the shallow, the applicant's services will be subject to the rules of the Sindh Agricultural University Employees (Utilities and Discipline) and other service rules and regulations will be in force from time to time. Argued that there were no employment laws. The objections to maintaining the constitutional petition were misunderstood and overturned, and since
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
