MAROOF JAN versus THE STATE
Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 367 the trial court's decision did not include points for determination, nor any decision on points with reasons that did not discuss the evidence presented by the prosecutor. The arguments before the trial court were considered. The judgment was not mentioned which did not meet the requirements of the law for all these reasons and violated the provisions of Section 367; CCPC trial court reached a conclusion regarding the accused's guilt. The full statement of the accused's statement was not confirmed. The allegations were not properly examined under Section 2342, the CRPR conviction and the sentence of the accused were dropped in the circumstances and after the trial of the accused, the case was re-written to the trial court. Shipped. Harmful content that is produced from evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer
