Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAROOF JAN versus THE STATE


Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 367 the trial court's decision did not include points for determination, nor any decision on points with reasons that did not discuss the evidence presented by the prosecutor. The arguments before the trial court were considered. The judgment was not mentioned which did not meet the requirements of the law for all these reasons and violated the provisions of Section 367; CCPC trial court reached a conclusion regarding the accused's guilt. The full statement of the accused's statement was not confirmed. The allegations were not properly examined under Section 2342, the CRPR conviction and the sentence of the accused were dropped in the circumstances and after the trial of the accused, the case was re-written to the trial court. Shipped. Harmful content that is produced from evidence

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Khushab lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.