PAKISTAN RAILWAY versus SHAHID FAROOQ
Article 31 Contract Contract Act (IX of 72 1872), the authority of Sections 182 and 185, the delivery of the goods to a local agent designated by the self-plaintiff as a cause of action against the carrier plaintiff, when the agent self-destroys the goods to the destination. Issued the delivery order, such agent did not submit the money, the plaintiff should have filed a case against him, not against the carrier, as the plaintiff admitted in his claimant that the agent designated by him Had to be shipped, so there is no reason. One year after that date, the suit was withheld when the suit reached the destination and the delivery was taken by his agent, the trial court-approved decree not binding. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Patoki lawyer
