MUKHTAR AHMAD versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Section 2 (i) Appellant for the duties he is performing because of the nature of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 duties, whether as a \ labor. Could be considered an important task. Supervising the contractor's work and seeing that he was performing the work as per the drawings etc. He did not have any expertise in the work performed by the appellant nor did he have any knowledge of the nature or the nature of the contract. Appellant's job, although checked bills and measurements, nevertheless, his work was largely of a caretaker nature and did not involve personal labor, which was related to the work done by workers / laborers. Investigation of the duties of the appellant revealed that his work does not involve routine or manual work but is important Using Services and supervision of the work by others
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
