GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Sections 133, 139A, 137 and 138 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) did not ask the defendant about the existence of a public right in the dispute under which section 139A, filed under the CCPC Procedure has been made to issue an unlawfully explicit departure. The respondents have no doubt in their objections that the petitioner had rejected the allegations made in his petition and even if such a breach was taken as a denial of the existence of a public right, the public right for the magistrate It was necessary to investigate the refusal. Instead of investigating the denial of the public right to the score magistrate and providing evidence in support of the denial of the respondents, conclude that it is appropriate to go to the inquiry on the merits of the case, therefore, section 139A, At this stage of departure from the compulsory procedure set by the CR PC, the proceedings against him were sent to the magistrate.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Mari Indus lawyer
