Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL


Sections 133, 139A, 137 and 138 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) did not ask the defendant about the existence of a public right in the dispute under which section 139A, filed under the CCPC Procedure has been made to issue an unlawfully explicit departure. The respondents have no doubt in their objections that the petitioner had rejected the allegations made in his petition and even if such a breach was taken as a denial of the existence of a public right, the public right for the magistrate It was necessary to investigate the refusal. Instead of investigating the denial of the public right to the score magistrate and providing evidence in support of the denial of the respondents, conclude that it is appropriate to go to the inquiry on the merits of the case, therefore, section 139A, At this stage of departure from the compulsory procedure set by the CR PC, the proceedings against him were sent to the magistrate.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Rabwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.