MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus NATIONAL BANK
0XXXVII, R 3 and Section 115 summit seek leave to defend suit and to defend the claim issued by the defendant, to be discharged from the court within ten days from the defendant's summons. Required, therefore, he has a legal right to leave. The court should have waited for the trial court to expire within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the summons against the defendant, but before the ten-day statutory period expires The verdict was tried, though it is considered contradictory. On their objection that his name is not correctly mentioned in the Simons, he, too, passed the negative order against him without allowing him to take full advantage of the law fixed by him. The defendant's defense was not justified in closing, and the trial court granted it. No one should be bothered to ask for leave because of the judgment of the court, and the decree passed against the defendant was set aside and the accused was acquitted on trial. h
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Mir Ali lawyer