Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADRAUF KHAN versus MIR SAHIB KHAN

Under Article 13 and 32 of the NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1987, any source and the manner in which he did not send a person to the pool to terminate the case, he made the request, under section 32 of Act X of 1987, notice. After two weeks from the date of the study, or whichever is earlier, the student will make a written notice. Due to confession by two truth witnesses under the Registered Corps, it affirmed its intention to exercise its former right to sovereignty. The pre-emptor did not furnish any receipt nor postal receipt, as evidenced by the evidence, to show that he had sought notice by sending notice to the administrator and that the notice was also provided in Section 32 of the Act X of 1987. Was sent within two weeks from the date of their knowledge or notice, whichever was earlier, the importer had knowledge of the sale because mutation 19, after the entry of 19, 1988, while Talash Ashid had written in the notice of date 3 8 1988. It did not claim to have been sent to the defendant, but even then two weeks after the date of sale of knowledge, the appointment of two witnesses would not meet the requirements of the law. In this way, Tal Assad did not work for the seller within two weeks, as contemplated under Section 13 of Act X of 1987, thus the premature rights would be extinguished. ? lawer from fb area from Village Sunder lawyer