MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P
Against the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Local Councils of the Frontier Provinces (Votes of Confidence) Rules 1980 and 36 of the Northwest Frontier Province Local Councils Chairman and Vice Chairman (vote of no confidence) Rules, 1980 Rr 3 and 4 Council of Trustees A council meeting was convened to consider the motion of dissent because of a complaint against two members who signed a motion of no confidence against the chairman of the local council, against whom three consecutive local council members Complaint pending absent from meetings. , A fine under which, after being removed from the membership of the Council, he did not face disqualification so as to prevent him from participating in the motion of no-confidence against the Chairman until a decision was made against him against the Chairman. A motion for confidence is requested. Since non-compliance with the provisions of RR 3 and 4 of the 1980 Rules was also invalid, there is no legal bar against such a meeting subject to the provisions of Section 36 of the 1979 Ordinance IV, which prohibits such meeting. The suspension is controversial. Meeting convened to consider motion of no-confidence motion against chairman, violation of Rules, 1980, chairman and vice-chairman of the councils on the direction of the government
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kharan lawyer