Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

VOLKERVAM (PAKISTAN) LTD versus SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION


West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance 1965 Section 22 Payment of Social Security Contribution by the Appellant against the amount sought and sought by the Social Security Court and the High Court. Was disclosed and the appellant needed to object and prove it. That the statement made by the authority was invalid or that the amount claimed could not be justified, the appellants had failed to do so, before the Social Security Court and the High Court and the Supreme Court before the ledgers. Such an assessment was made on inspection and the books of accounts, the appellants had to object to the amount examined and to prove that the account statement was wrongly mentioned or claimed. The demand for a social protection contribution for a particular year was, in accordance with the law and unimaginable

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Umer Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.