Find a Lawyer

HAMID MAJID versus DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 184 (3) and 185 (3) requests for appeal in the educational institution requesting disciplinary action in this regard, in which a candidate allegedly receives a written notice from his / her possession. Notes are prevented from appearing in specific exams. The candidate's process of writing / answering the exam papers was that if the whole system of examination was corrupted and the government machinery was presented as an inadequate spectacle, then it would have to give some punishment and It was unfair to ignore 's actions. People who either bribed and marked the weapon or applied for it or used alternatively used force, though it affected the court but the Supreme Court in their application for leave It was not possible for her to appeal to the extent or to appeal the judgment. If the severity of the problem is that good students are at a disadvantage and the bad students are benefiting, they can attract this jurisdiction themselves. Under Article 184 (3) of the facts of the Constitution, the Supreme Court and the circumstances of the present case, however, were not sufficient to examine this point by the candidate's Supreme Court Counsel, if desired, separating the Registrar, the Supreme. Appeals from the court on his leave of appeal for appeal was dismissed top advocate from Swat lawyer