Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 344, 347 and 528 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/307/427/34, in a single trial before two different courts for prosecution. So they should be prosecuted. Evidence should not be considered in one case after another in the same court. The use of the evidence of the prosecutor in one case since the defense evidence in the cross-case was illegal, there are no hard and fast rules that can be set. Which of the two should proceed? First and foremost depends on the circumstances of each case. Two contradictory cases could not be dealt with by the same decision and in each such case it was necessary to record separate judgments based on the evidence available on the record so that the different courts could Run separate cases of two cross cases. Not bad, but there should be only one exception when it depends on the facts of the case in light of the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of PLD 1971 SC 713 [criminal case]. inheritance advocates near Gohar Ghoushti lawyer